Read a timeline as a set of propositions.

• Support
• Tension
• Qualification

Directional editorial links, each with its reason stated.

1. Support1.1 supports 1Repeated near-misses establish the seam as the place where the whole is judged.
2. Support1.2 supports 1A missing edit affordance makes a tiny typo expose the platform’s design.
3. Qualification1.3 qualifies 1The problem is not automation alone, but where review and craft now occur.
4. Tension2.1 challenges 1.1A conspicuous failure can increase comic value even while lowering functional quality.
5. Support2.2 supports 2.1Treating the model as a character makes its mistakes available for play.
6. Support2.3 supports 3.3The product briefs all ask software to expose structure in public activity.
7. Tension2.4 challenges 2.3Not every executable prompt begins with a need; sometimes the available quota supplies the motive.
8. Support3.1 supports 3The corpus repeatedly offers gestures and scenes whose public display is their point.
9. Qualification3.2 qualifies 3.1A fragment performs only when an audience can supply its missing context.
10. Qualification3.3 qualifies 3Performance is not only expression; it also generates data that tools can inspect.